Overview
Design review gets complicated fast when multiple consultants are in the drawings. Markups pile up across disciplines, ownership gets murky, and resolution tracking falls apart.
This community-led workflow discussion is for architecture teams who want to talk honestly about how they're managing coordinated review in Bluebeam — what's working, what isn't, and how other firms are handling it.
What We'll Cover:
- How a structured Studio Session setup supports multi-discipline review
- Markup ownership and status tracking across consultant sets
- What a review closeout looks like when it works
- Open discussion: how are your teams running coordinated review right now?
Key Takeaways:
- A concrete example of one structured multi-party review workflow in Revu
- Practical approaches to markup ownership and resolution tracking
- Honest peer comparison — what other architecture teams are actually doingÂ
Who Should Attend:Â
Project architects, design technology leads, BIM managers, CAD managers, and anyone at an architecture firm who touches the review and coordination process — from intern to principal.
Why attend this meeting/session?
- Attend & receive complimentary tips from Bluebeam's workflow consultant experts!
- Presented by Bluebeam team:
- Erik Schonsett, Manager | Consulting Services
- Charles Todd, Workflow Consultant II
Important information:
Workflows Talks aren't webinars; they're interactive sessions and group discussions with Bluebeam's workflow experts and your peers!