Best Of

Same situation here. We spend a lot of work and time setting up our processes so we can use Bluebeam Cloud for our site management (especially punch management) and exactly on the day, where we wanted to teach the stuff on it this message appeared out of no where. Throwing out functionalities without a replacement and this with almost no notice isn't developing or improving a product, this only weakens the trust we had in the Bluebeam products. This seems to be kind of unprofessional and will probably lead to the question if we can trust Bluebeam enough to work with you in the future. Changes are fine and important and will always find some resistance, but be aware that this isn't just a change, this is a step back and a waste of resource for your costumers.

Same here. We started using it when they went subscription based last year. I'm OK if they want to switch it, but they should have the replacement part of Studio Projects up and running so a transition can be made. Studio Projects doesn't have the RFI and Punch functionality built in.

The report aspect of the punch tool is (soon, was) a useful tool.

Agree, with auto save. I believe the auto recovery currently only works if using "studio" in the meantime use a auto save software like "auotsaver" easy to adjust how often it hits "CTRL S"

@Sondra.Camis If you have a lot of docs open you can also periodically select the "save all" or "Shift F2" option to save all open files.

Autosave is a MUST. Sometimes I have documents open and my computer reboots for an update. The program hasn't "crashed" so the document is not included in document recovery. All work is lost. Also, even though there is a "save changes" prompt when closing, people make mistakes. When I have a large number of documents open, it's easy to miss one or two that need to be saved. I realize this is all human error on my part, however I can't help but curse Revu when I lose hours of markup work for not having an autosave feature.

@Glynis D. that would be great as the resetting of the layers really makes having the template rather useless for me.

Hi @Philippe Lanthier! I do understand the page numbers shifted, but clicking the links still takes you to the correct location. Perhaps I could have illustrated this using Tree Style without page numbers. The intent was to show one way to navigate, while not necessarily reliant on page number. Additionally, the Index could go to the end of the document if worried about page numbers. I hope this helps!

Great news! Under settings, you can orient the Summary to Landscape.